Adidas Vs Payless Intellectual Property - PRIOPT
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Adidas Vs Payless Intellectual Property


Adidas Vs Payless Intellectual Property. This case is primarily known for the award of damages worth a whopping $305 million by a jury trial, and its subsequent reduction in a retrial. In nov 2001, adidas brought this action against payless shoesource for trademark infringement and dilution, injury to business reputation, unfair competition under the trademark act of 1946;

Intellectual Property and Trademark Enforcement
Intellectual Property and Trademark Enforcement from www.slideshare.net

Payless and its $300 million verdict 5c analysis is based on hbr framework. In 1994, adidas sued payless over these same stripes. What role does a brand like adidas play in the purchase of products such as sports shoes?

Up To 24% Cash Back Adidas America Inc.


Adidas believes the brand has been in use since 1952. This case is primarily known for the award of damages worth a whopping $305 million by a jury trial, and its subsequent reduction in a retrial. The jury sat before district court and awarded adidas subsidiary $304.6 million dollars in damages.

In Nov 2001, Adidas Brought This Action Against Payless Shoesource For Trademark Infringement And Dilution, Injury To Business Reputation, Unfair Competition Under The Trademark Act Of 1946;


On may 5, 2008, after nearly four weeks of trial and two days of deliberation, a portland jury awarded adidas america and its parent, adidas ag, $305 million in damages in a trademark action against payless shoesource. The jury also found that payless acted willfully and maliciously, and determined that adidas was entitled to $30.6 million in actual damages (based on a 7.78 percent royalty calculation), $137. The agreement can only be reasonably interpreted as imposing on payless an ongoing obligation to refrain from selling shoes bearing the stripes prohibited under the agreement, and imposing on adidas a reciprocal ongoing obligation to refrain from taking legal action against payless based solely on its.

Key Players In This Case Is Payless Shoesource And Adidas America Adidas Have Incorporated The Three Striped Logo Back In 1952 On Their Shoes.


In 2001, pires sold a product of the same brand. 4.adidas america vs payless shoesource in 1994, two shoe companies were involved in a controversy over brand issues. 300 x 300 pixels (60065 bytes) image name:

Ended At The Trial Level With A Jury Verdict Against Payless In The Amount Of $305 Million.


The famous three stripes have been well defended by adidas as a registered trademark. However, the author believes that this judgment has more to it than just a simple. Adidas america, inc et al v.

Therefore, The 1994 Settlement Agreement Does Not Preclude Adidas's [Sic] Present Lanham Act Claims Against Payless.


For some time, payless allowed the sale of items with two striped packages that resembled the adidas logo. Adidas has been using the three three stripes designs since 1952. A brand is essentially a mark that is used by an organization to distinguish its products from its competitors.


Post a Comment for "Adidas Vs Payless Intellectual Property"