Owl Property Chain Axiom

Owl Property Chain Axiom. > folks, > > apparently, protégé 4.2 has changed the way one defines property chains in owl 2. Grandchildofbritishgrandmother subclassof (hasparent o hasmother) some briton, for instance.that's a case where it would be handy to be able to have the chain as an explicit thing that could be used as the first argument.

OWL2 property chain axiom to infer that all positions described in an from www.researchgate.net

Adding a haskey axiom using the property would generate an ambiguous rdf document. Decidability in owl (dl and 1.1) relies on the fact that datatype consistency can. In the description logic syntax, these would be something like:

Source: www.researchgate.net

Grandchildofbritishgrandmother subclassof (hasparent o hasmother) some briton, for instance.that's a case where it would be handy to be able to have the chain as an explicit thing that could be used as the first argument. @uninformeduser (i know this is an old post, but i'm looking at the same kind of construction.) it can be useful to represent things like:

Source: www.researchgate.net

The meaning of object property characteristics, such as 'transitive' the meaning of object property axiom types, such as subpropertyof; This link purges a page's cache to get the most recent results.

Source: www.w3.org

Do each of my (subproperty) assertions actually get anded together to form the antecedent of a. There is no syntactic way to use a data property in a role chain.

Such A Specification Is Not Necessary For Owl Full, As *Any* Rdf Graph Is An Owl Full Ontology.

Combining property chain axioms and cardinality constraints may lead to undecidability • restriction: @uninformeduser (i know this is an old post, but i'm looking at the same kind of construction.) it can be useful to represent things like: Now one defines the superproperty of a chain, but i wonder about the syntax.

I Would Like To Take For Example Interop:applicationauthor.

You might be able to do what you want if you box the data value and define a new object property for use in the role chain. There is no syntactic way to use a data property in a role chain. Decidability in owl (dl and 1.1) relies on the fact that datatype consistency can.

This Will Work In Some Reasoners, But Unfortunately, This Does Bring Us Out Of Owl 2 Dl And Into Owl Full.

Grandchildofbritishgrandmother subclassof (hasparent o hasmother) some briton, for instance.that's a case where it would be handy to be able to have the chain as an explicit thing that could be used as the first argument. Use only simple properties in cardinality expressions (i.e. Owl 2 role chains are only allowed for object properties;

This Section Lists Test That Are Using This Feature (Refresh View) Info.png Query Results Are Cached With Wiki Pages For Some Time, Even If The Data Changes.

The meaning of object property characteristics, such as 'transitive' the meaning of object property axiom types, such as subpropertyof; Hope this helps thomas on 11.04.2013, at 03:05, obrst, leo j. Just declare a new object property rnationalplayers and assert the axioms.

Intersection, Existential Quanti Cation, Enumerations To A Single

In the description logic syntax, these would be something like: Id policy and uri structure (also: Subclass, equivalent class, disjoint class property axioms ontology owl: